Software Developer and Performance Engineer
Rants
All rants go here so people can avoid them if they want.
Comment on States Taxing Companies with Affiliates
Jul 5th
I recently read this article on Yahoo that talked about how states are going after companies with affiliates in their states for tax revenue. This seems pretty stupid, as in killing the “Golden Goose.”
The Internet is responsible for the creation of a great amount of wealth over the years. Granted, it is also responsible for the elimination of many businesses as well. This is how “creative destruction” works in our economy. New ideas and progress make people rich while old ideas die and go away.
If only this were true of the government though. Every year it just gets bigger and bigger. It looks for more ways to generate income to satisfy its insatiable appetite. In lean times, it resorts to stupid ideas like this one. It changes, many times for the worse, how the economic game of progress is played. Governments do well when the economy is doing well. They should do everything they can to help the companies within their borders to succeed. Instead, this looks like a destructive way to fill a budget gap. I fear that this is going to kill eCommerce as we know it.
Currently a great number of people make money sharing their expertise on the Internet. They get paid by promoting good products and warning us about bad ones. They inform us of ways to better our lives, and in return we purchase the products they recommend and they get paid by those selling the products. This is no different than sending a letter through the mail to a friend saying the new car they bought is incredible and that they should get one. Just because a company is willing to pay a finders fee doesn’t mean it has hired a person to do any work. It is rewarding the efforts of people to share information about products. This is advertising at its core and has been the basis of our economy for other 100 years. Companies pay millions to get the word out using advertising agencies. Does this mean that they now have a business interest in the state where the the ad agency resides? Most decidedly not.
Companies like Amazon agree to pay someone for help in selling a product. It is strictly advertising revenue, and they have no business interest in any state except where they have a physical presense. Saying otherwise means that every business has a business interest in every state. Any company wants to sell its products and doesn’t necessarily care whether what state the customer lives in.
If I recommend to a relative some service and I get a discount as a result, does that mean the company now has a business interest in my state? That kind of logic just boggles the mind. I was not hired by the company to do anything. I was encouraged to share information and for that they are most grateful when a sale occurs. To encourage this sharing of information, they offer an incentive. It is just that simple. Affiliate programs are just the same except that people have made a business out of it. If they are a business, then they must pay taxes where they live. That is how the system works and that still doesn’t mean that the seller of a product has a business interest there. Only that the person creating the link and posting information has a business interest. It is they who should be paying income taxes on the money they collect. But they didn’t sell a product. They didn’t handle any money. They didn’t do any activity that would connect them with the seller other than mentioning where a product may be bought.
For decades traditional companies have sold items across state lines. The products were shipped to other states and no sales tax was collected. There was no legal right to it because the purchase was from a company in another state and so no tax was collected. Internet companies operate the same way except that with the Internet, it is now easier to find their products and make a purchase. Lots of technologies have converged to help make this simplicity a reality. Now the states are rushing in and crying foul. They want to collect taxes on sales to which they are not entitled.
Companies are not stupid and the best will survive. If they find it cheaper to shut down an affiliate program than to continue one, then standard business practice demands that it be shut down. The states have essentially pushed a logical decision in response to their illogical argument. It should be no surprise that the small business will suffer as a result.
I find it despicable that a state would even consider pursuing such a course. They stand to loose a great deal. Many small companies will shut their doors since their income has been cut off. Millions in taxes collected from these business and their workers will disappear. In its place will be people filing for unemployment benefits along with all the other welfare handouts the government has to offer. States should spend their time trying to figure out how to get people back to work. They should try to educate workers, helping them train for the jobs in demand today. Instead, they seem determined to look for the quick path to cash as a means to solve their problems. This is destined to end in failure bodes ill for the country. Millions of jobs have already been lost. Let’s stop looking for ways to eliminate even more jobs.
Best Car Dealers May Not Survive
May 16th
I read an article Sunday in my local newspaper about how a bad dealer is being kept by GM while a dealer they liked is being let go. I thought about this for a minute and realized that it makes total sense. GM is going to keep the dealers that sell lots of cars. Those dealers that sell fewer new cars are not as good for GM. It turns out that the good dealer does great repairs, has good people working the used car lot, and lots of customers like them. They make plenty of money and do a great job for their customers. But because they don’t sell as many cars for GM, they will be let go. Whenever I see something that doesn’t make sense, I always look for the money reason. In this case, the money reason is simple. GM wants dealers that sell lots of new cars. Customers want dealers who take care of them. So it is safe to assume that a number of great dealers are not going to make the cut.
It is the Economy Stupid. Leave it Alone!
May 14th
The problem with the economy is that no one will leave it alone. It keeps getting stirred up by stimulus plans such as stimulus checks, a housing voucher, vehicle vouchers, and who knows what is next. People are not buying because they are uncertain of the future. It doesn’t matter how cheap that house or car is. If you are afraid of loosing your job and facing the possibility of living off your savings for a long time, you are not going to buy anything. The economy is grinding to a halt because of uncertainty, not because people don’t want to buy things. Giving them incentives to buy only helps those who have the money and feel certain their job is not in jeopardy. They would probably have bought anyway so the stimulus check or voucher being given ends up having no net effect. If you want to stimulate the economy, make it boring, predictable, consistent, with few rule changes except where it matters. Complete and fair oversight of companies to ensure they are being operated within the law. When people have confidence that their job is secure, they will buy houses and cars. Until then though, all the stimulus plans in the world won’t motivate people to buy anything if they don’t believe in their financial future.
Extend Voucher Program to Investors
May 9th
Why not make the $8k voucher program available to investors? Instead of limiting the program to people who are looking to buy their primary residence, how about we get these homes off the market. Granted, there are investors who should not be allowed to participate in the program. Criteria should be setup to ensure that the right investors are being encouraged to purchase homes. Requiring them to have tons of cash on hand is not a solution. It just limits the investors chosen to those who have lots of money anyway. They can afford to buy up houses at deep discounts. Instead, find the small investor who has less homes than the Fannie Mae loan limit which sits at 9 right now. Help them buy another home or two so that they can successfully manage the property as a productive asset. Tenants need places to live, but if the investor is having trouble, it is going to affect the tenant. There are lots of small investors out there who cannot buy homes because of how tight credit is, and the increase in rates and requirements they must meet to purchase a home. Freeing up these small investors to buy a home or two will take lots of homes off the market. It is also very likely that the homes will be managed much better as it will be more than just another home. It will be their 3rd home or 8th home. Some of these small time investors will make it big and buy up yet more homes. They just need an environment where they can grow. Right now there are so many rules, limits, regulations, and requirements; it is impossible for them to take advantage of the cheap housing that is flooding the market today.